<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Liliputing - Latest Comments in Poll results: Which Linux distro is best for netbooks</title><link>http://liliputing.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:25:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Poll results: Which Linux distro is best for netbooks</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/06/poll-results-which-linux-distro-is-best.html#comment-786800</link><description>Personally the delays have made me take more of a stance of evaluating all the new net books that will be available in the next couple of months. Since I no longer have that GOTTA HAVE IT NOW urge due to the unavailability of the Wind, I will probably wait for the 6 cell to be available before I get one, or seriously look at the DELL E since price wise, it's a couple of hundred less from the looks of it...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FDA</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FDAMAN</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll results: Which Linux distro is best for netbooks</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/06/poll-results-which-linux-distro-is-best.html#comment-786107</link><description>If the Eee PC can enjoy success after its many delays to market and a large price hike from what Asus originally announced, then I'm sure the Wind can still enjoy similar success.if it comes to market late -  as long as its price remains unchanged.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:15:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll results: Which Linux distro is best for netbooks</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/06/poll-results-which-linux-distro-is-best.html#comment-784203</link><description>Generally, pushing back dates surely disappoints customers most especially if they awaits the product. And it seems like more customers are excited to see and feel MSI but they are kept waiting. Surely, it also affects its reputation to large percent of customers. But if customers choose to be more practical over their prides, if you know what I mean, they still should get MSI. $200 is quite a value.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aldrin Cantos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:16:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll results: Which Linux distro is best for netbooks</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/06/poll-results-which-linux-distro-is-best.html#comment-783589</link><description>You missed Mandriva Spring 2008.1 which works out of the box on the eee PC.  My already aging 701 works like a charm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:09:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll results: Which Linux distro is best for netbooks</title><link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/06/poll-results-which-linux-distro-is-best.html#comment-783153</link><description>I've been pretty set on the 901, but still seeing the wind get pushed back again and again is disheartening. I don't think it is MSI's fault directly, more of the battery/Atom shortage. Which means everyone is getting held up. I'm really hoping that July 7/8 date holds up for MSI/Asus because I've been waiting to get a new laptop for far too long.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't see why anyone would get the 1000H over the Wind. The battery life is a problem right now, but I'm sure after this shortage blows over they will up it back to 6 cell, creating an eee900 like PR disaster. But really, what are the differences between the 1000H and Wind? Draft-N? I think spec wise that's about it. There are some subtle differences (Dolby Sound Room, keyboard variations) but spec wise it's just the wifi, and now the battery. Even if they offer the 6-cell later, it still won't be 200 bucks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dean</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:15:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>